Asset-Based Lending for Staffing Agencies
For a staffing agency, asset-based lending means a receivables-only facility, because receivables are effectively the entire balance sheet — there is no inventory and there is rarely meaningful equipment. As of 2026, staffing facilities run $250K to $25MM, advance 85%-90% against eligible receivables, and price from Prime plus 1%-5% for an ABL structure or 0.5%-1.5% per invoice for factoring, with setup in 10-20 business days. The problem the facility solves is structural rather than temporary: payroll runs weekly and clients pay in 45 to 60 days, so every new placement consumes cash before it produces any, and a growing agency is short of money precisely because it is growing. Two things stop these deals more than anything else — unbilled accrued time, which is not eligible collateral until it is invoiced, and unpaid payroll taxes, because an IRS lien primes the lender and no facility closes over one.
A few questions, no credit pull, no obligation. Or call 770-820-7409.
Where this fits best
Our sweet spot is $5MM to $50MM in revenue on asks between $250K and $5MM. We work meaningfully smaller and meaningfully larger — we have closed $250K factoring lines and $50MM facilities in the same year. What usually decides fit is your credit, your existing debt, and whether the structure works at all. Size is the last thing we look at, not the first.
- •Sweet spot is $5MM-$50MM in annual revenue and two or more years operating — neither is a cutoff
- •Commercial or government clients on terms — light industrial, IT, healthcare, professional
- •Payroll taxes current, with proof
- •Timekeeping and billing tight enough to invoice weekly
- •Client concentration under roughly 30%-40%, or a plan for the one account that is over
What is actually going on
Staffing is the clearest example in business of growth consuming cash. You place twelve people on Monday, you pay them Friday, and the client pays you in 45 days. Every dollar of new revenue costs you roughly six weeks of payroll before it produces anything, so the faster you grow the tighter it gets. The owner ends up funding a growing business out of personal reserves, which works until it does not. What makes this financeable is that the receivable is genuinely good. A staffing invoice against a creditworthy employer for hours already worked, verified by an approved timesheet, is about as clean an asset as exists in commercial lending. That is why advance rates in staffing run higher than in most industries — 85% to 90% is normal — and why lenders who specialize here are comfortable at sizes a general commercial lender would not touch on the same financials. The two things that reliably kill staffing deals are both self-inflicted and both fixable. The first is unbilled accrued time: hours worked but not yet invoiced are not eligible collateral, which means an agency that bills semi-monthly is carrying up to two weeks of payroll with no borrowing base credit for it. Moving to weekly billing often creates more availability than negotiating a better advance rate would. The second is payroll taxes. An unpaid 941 liability produces a federal tax lien that primes any lender security interest, and lenders will not close over one. This comes up more than it should, because an agency squeezed for cash often treats the payroll tax deposit as the most flexible payment available. It is the least flexible one. If this is where you are, deal with the liability first — the financing conversation only becomes possible after.
How it works
Verify the receivables are billable now
Eligible means invoiced, against an approved timesheet, within terms. Accrued unbilled time contributes nothing until it is billed, so the first structural question is usually how often you invoice rather than how much you can borrow.
Confirm payroll taxes are current
Expect to produce 941 filings and deposit records. This is a gate, not a preference. If there is a liability, it needs to be resolved or under a documented installment agreement the lender can review before anything else happens.
Choose ABL or factoring
ABL is cheaper and you keep collecting; factoring is faster to put in place, more forgiving of thin financials, and the factor handles collections through a lockbox. Many agencies start with factoring and move to ABL after twelve to eighteen months of clean history.
Set the facility to fund payroll cycles
The practical test is whether a draw can be requested and funded inside your payroll window. Facilities that fund within 24 hours of invoice upload are what makes weekly payroll work; a facility that takes three days does not solve the problem.
The line scales with headcount
Add placements, invoice more, borrow more — without a new credit approval. This is the whole reason a staffing agency wants a collateral-based facility rather than a fixed-limit loan.
Terms, costs and timelines
| Facility size | $250K - $25MM |
|---|---|
| Advance rate on eligible AR | 85%-90% |
| ABL pricing (2026) | Prime + 1%-5% on drawn funds |
| Factoring pricing (2026) | 0.5%-1.5% per invoice, depending on terms and client credit |
| Funding speed once live | 24-48 hours from invoice upload |
| Setup time | 10-20 business days |
| Ineligible collateral | Unbilled accrued time, invoices past 90 days, disputed hours, intercompany |
| Hard gate | Payroll taxes current — an IRS lien primes the lender and stops the deal |
| Concentration | Reserves typically begin above 30%-40% for a single client |
| Serve fee | A success fee, earned only on closing. Agreed in writing before you sign anything. No retainers, no upfront costs |
A receivables facility vs. the advance an agency usually takes instead
| A revenue-based advance sized to deposits | A receivables facility that scales with placements | |
|---|---|---|
| How much is available | A fixed amount, roughly 10%-15% of annual revenue | 85%-90% of your invoiced receivables, recalculated continuously |
| What happens when you grow | Nothing — you reapply, or stack a second position | Availability rises with the invoice book automatically |
| Repayment | Daily or weekly ACH from deposits, whether clients paid or not | Self-liquidating — the facility repays as clients pay |
| Cost | Factor rates that annualize well past 50% | Prime + 1%-5%, or 0.5%-1.5% per invoice |
| Effect on payroll timing | Extracts cash on payroll week | Funds within 24-48 hours of invoicing, on your payroll cycle |
| Intermediary compensation | Built into the factor rate rather than quoted separately, so you rarely see it | A success fee, agreed in writing before you sign and earned only if you close |
How this plays out, with numbers
A light industrial staffing agency doing about $11MM in revenue is funding weekly payroll of roughly $150K out of the owner personal line of credit and a single advance taken the previous spring. Receivables stand at $1.75MM across nineteen clients, the largest at 22% of the book. Payroll taxes are current. The first finding has nothing to do with the lender. The agency bills semi-monthly, so at any moment $250K-$300K of worked hours sit unbilled and therefore ineligible. Moving to weekly invoicing adds roughly $260K of eligible receivables before a single term is negotiated. With that change, about $1.6MM of the book is eligible after removing aged and disputed items, supporting roughly $1.4MM at an 88% advance rate. We place a factoring facility at 88% with a 1.05% fee per invoice on 45-day terms and 24-hour funding, closed in 13 business days. The advance taken the previous spring is retired out of the first draw. Fourteen months later the same book supports an ABL at Prime plus 3%, which cuts the cost of the facility by roughly 40% and returns collections to the agency. The factoring facility was the on-ramp, not the destination.
A representative structure, sized to a typical file. Details are generalized — we do not publish client specifics.
When this is the wrong answer
Half of being useful is being clear about what does not work. If one of these describes you, the honest path is below — and it may not run through us.
Fix this first — it is not negotiable. A federal tax lien takes priority over the lender security interest, so no facility closes until the liability is resolved or sits under a formal installment agreement the lender can review. Get a payroll tax professional on it, then come back to us. We would rather help you structure the facility on the other side of that than pretend it is not in the way.
Contingent fee receivables are harder to finance because the fee is often refundable within a guarantee period. Some lenders will work with them at lower advance rates. If your book is a mix, expect the temp side to carry the facility.
Classification exposure is a real credit issue rather than paperwork, and lenders read it as a contingent liability. Worth resolving before a facility gets underwritten around it. Tell us where it stands anyway — if it is already being addressed, that is often a conversation lenders will have.
Advance rates collapse under that kind of concentration. A credit-insured factoring structure on that specific account debtor is often the only workable answer.
